Investment land — path-of-growth, comp-sales, honest math.

South-central New Mexico — Sacramento Mountains, Lincoln National Forest, Ruidoso resort area

Lincoln County is a workable investment target with one specific micro-thesis: the Ruidoso resort economy. Resort-town real estate has a different dynamic than rural land — limited supply (mountain geography constrains buildable area), persistent recreational demand (Texas/Oklahoma weekenders, retirees), and a tourism economy that drives short-term-rental cash flow. Land + cabin appreciation in Ruidoso/Alto has historically run 4–7% annually, well above general rural-NM rates. The risks are also concentrated and real: wildfire (2012 and 2024 fires both materially affected property values for years), seasonal tourism cycles, and resort-town volatility tied to broader discretionary spending. As a generic rural-NM investment, Lincoln is no better than average. As a Ruidoso-specific resort/STR play, it has actual upside.

Read the full investment analysis →

Southwestern Montana — Yellowstone River corridor, Gallatin Range, north entrance to Yellowstone NP

Park County is a workable investment target on a specific thesis: Bozeman-metro spillover continues. Bozeman has been one of the fastest-growing micropolitan areas in the United States for the past decade, with population growth, university expansion (MSU), and an outdoor-industry economy that keeps attracting new residents. Park County rides that wave from one valley over — the Paradise Valley + Livingston corridor has appreciated 8–12% annually over 10 years, well above general rural-MT rates. The risks are real and concentrated: wildfire (Yellowstone-adjacent areas burn), flood (Yellowstone River 2022 event was devastating in places), and a recession-sensitive tourism + outdoor-industry economy. If the Bozeman-metro thesis continues, Park County keeps appreciating. If Bozeman cools — and it could, with significant new construction in the metro relieving price pressure — Park may give back gains.

Read the full investment analysis →

Northern Front Range Colorado — Fort Collins / Loveland / Estes Park, Roosevelt NF, Rocky Mountain NP adjacency

Larimer County is a strong investment target on a structural thesis: the Front Range corridor (Fort Collins / Loveland / Boulder / Denver) has been one of the most consistent population-growth areas in the United States for two decades, and Larimer is the northernmost anchor of that corridor. Population has grown 20% per decade since 2000. Median home prices have appreciated 6-10% annually over a decade. The economy is diversified (university, healthcare, technology, manufacturing — Anheuser-Busch, Woodward, OtterBox are all here) rather than tourism-dependent. The risks are ones every Front Range buyer faces: wildfire, water (long-term), and a market that's already priced in years of growth. If you believe Front Range growth continues, Larimer rides that wave. If you think the corridor cools, Larimer gives back gains alongside Boulder and Denver.

Read the full investment analysis →

Northern Arizona — Flagstaff, Sedona, San Francisco Peaks, Grand Canyon NP south rim, Coconino NF

Coconino is workable for investment with a Flagstaff-specific thesis: NAU + healthcare + government + tourism keep the population growing modestly, and Phoenix metro spillover (high-desert escape buyers) has driven significant appreciation. Population grew ~12% from 2010-2020. Median home price has appreciated 7-10% annually over a decade. The economy is diversified enough (NAU, hospitals, federal employment, tourism) that it doesn't rely on any single anchor. The risks: wildfire, climate (water in Northern AZ is increasingly tight), and a market that's already priced in the Phoenix-spillover narrative — limited margin of safety at current prices.

Read the full investment analysis →

Western Oregon — Willamette Valley, Cascade foothills, Pacific coast access

Lane County is workable for investment on a steady-growth thesis. Eugene-Springfield metro grows ~5-8% per decade — slower than Front Range Colorado or Phoenix metro, but consistent and diversified. UO + healthcare + tech (Concentric Sky, Symantec presence, growing startup scene) anchor the economy. Median home appreciation has run 6-9% annually over a decade. The risks are different from SW counties: less wildfire concentration but real rural-fire exposure, less water concern, and Oregon's land-use law structurally constrains supply (which supports prices).

Read the full investment analysis →

Austin metro northern suburbs — Round Rock, Cedar Park, Georgetown, Leander

Williamson County is among the strongest investment counties in the United States and has been for two decades. The thesis is straightforward: it's the northern half of one of the fastest-growing major metros in the country (Austin), it has the demographic + economic + infrastructure tailwinds that drive sustained appreciation, and it has done what every land investor wants — land bought 10+ years ago is worth multiples now. Population grew +44% from 2010 to 2020. Median home prices have appreciated 9-12% annually over a decade. Major employers (Apple, Tesla, Samsung, Dell, Oracle, Apple semiconductor manufacturing campus) anchor a diversified tech-manufacturing economy. The risks are real but well-understood: traffic + sprawl + water + Texas property tax, and a market that may have already priced in years of growth.

Read the full investment analysis →

Phoenix metro — Sonoran Desert, Salt River valley

Maricopa County has been one of the strongest investment counties in the United States for the past two decades. Phoenix metro grew from ~3.8M to ~4.9M people over 2010-2020 — relentless in-migration from California, the Midwest, and elsewhere. Land values, both residential and commercial, have appreciated 8-13% annually over a decade. The economy is diversified across technology (Intel, TSMC fab construction, Honeywell, Banner Health), finance (American Express, USAA), tourism, and a massive education sector. Risks are real and getting more pressing: water (Colorado River allocations are tightening), heat (extreme heat events trending up), and rapid suburbanization that creates infrastructure strain. Even with those, the structural in-migration thesis has worked for 30 years and there's no clear reason to bet against it in the next 10.

Read the full investment analysis →

North Carolina Piedmont — Raleigh, Cary, Apex; Research Triangle east anchor

Wake County is among the strongest US investment counties on a Research Triangle path-of-growth thesis. Raleigh + Durham + Chapel Hill form a tech-biotech corridor anchored by Duke, UNC, NC State, and a dense ecosystem of tech companies (Cisco, Red Hat, IBM, GSK biotech, Apple's planned $1B campus). Population grew +20% from 2010-2020. Median home prices have appreciated 7-11% annually over a decade. The Triangle's diversification across tech + biotech + university + government provides resilience that single-industry metros lack. Risks are real but well-understood: rapid growth strains infrastructure, hurricane risk (moderate inland), and a market that has already priced in significant in-migration.

Read the full investment analysis →